For Telangana - from Loksabha

on 5 Aug 2011 in Loksabha  SHRIMATI SUSHMA SWARAJ  called the attention of the Minister of Home Affairs to the situation arising out  of delay in creation  of Telangana State and steps taken by the Government in this regard.

 THE MINISTER OF HOME AFFAIRS (SHRI P. CHIDAMBARAM) said in response that Hon. Members are aware of the circumstances under which the Government of India set up a five member Committee under the Chairmanship of Mr. Justice (Retd.) B.N. Srikrishna in February 2010. The Committee was requested to hold consultations with all sections of the people and all political parties and groups in Andhra Pradesh to examine the situation  in the State of Andhra Pradesh with reference to the demand for a separate State of Telangana as well as the demand for maintaining the present status of a united Andhra Pradesh. This Committee submitted its report on December 30, 2010. In its report, the Committee has listed the following six  solutions/possible options as the way

forward:

(i)  Maintaining status quo,

(ii)  Bifurcation of the State   into    Seemandhra   and   Telangana, with Hyderabad as a Union Territory and the two States developing their own capitals in due course,

(iii Bifurcation of the State into Rayala-Telangana  and coastal Andhra regions with Hyderabad being an integral part of Rayala-Telangana,

(iv)  Bifurcation of Andhra Pradesh into Seemandhra and Telangana with enlarged Hyderabad Metropolis as  a separate Union Territory. This Union Territory will have geographical linkage and contiguity  viaNalgonda district in the southeast Guntur in coastal Andhra and viaMahboobnagar district in the south to Kurnool district in Rayalaseema,

(v)  Bifurcation of the State into  Telangana and Seemandhra as per existing boundaries with Hyderabad as the capital of Telangana and Seemandhra to have a new capital,

(vi)  Keeping the State united by simultaneously providing certain definite Constitutional/Statutory measures  for socio-economic development and political empowerment of Telangana region - creation of a statutorily empowered Telangana Regional Council.

Following the submission of the report, I convened a meeting of all the major political parties represented in  the Andhra Pradesh State Legislature on January 6, 2011 and requested them to consider the report of the Justice Srikrishna Committee and form an opinion in this regard.

The consultation process with various political parties of Andhra Pradesh is continuing. A suitable decision will be taken in the light of these discussions. The Government of India is keeping a close watch on the political developments as well as on the law and order situation in the State.

Meanwhile, the Chief Minister of Andhra Pradesh requested the Government of India to consider the  demand to delete paragraph 14(f) of the Andhra Pradesh Public Employment (Organization of Local Cadres and Regulation of Direct Recruitment) Order 1975. Under paragraph 14(f) of the Order, any post of Police Officer, as defined in section  3 (b) of the Hyderabad City Police Act, 1348 F, is exempted from the purview of  aforesaid Order. This implied that Hyderabad City would be a 'free zone' for the purpose of recruitment to the police.

The deletion of paragraph 14(f) would include Hyderabad city in Zone VI for the

purpose of recruitment to the police of the city. The Chief Minister commended the

resolution of the Andhra Pradesh Legislative Assembly dated March 18, 2010 that

supported deletion of paragraph 14(f).

After careful consideration, Government has decided to recommend to the

President that clause (f) of paragraph 14 of the Andhra Pradesh Public

Employment (Organization of Local Cadres and Regulation of Direct Recruitment Order, 1975 may be deleted subject to the Resolution on the subject earlier passed

being re-iterated by the Legislative Assembly of Andhra Pradesh. The decision of

the Government was communicated to the State Government on July 13, 2011 for

suitable action.

The Chief Minister,  vide letter dated August 1,  2011, has informed the

Government of India that the earlier resolution of the Legislative Assembly dated

March 18, 2010 still holds good and there is no change in the composition of the

 Legislative Assembly. He has, therefore, requested that a recommendation may be

made to the President on the basis of the resolution of March 18, 2010. The matter

is under active consideration.

The Government would like to make an earnest appeal to all sections of the

people in Andhra Pradesh that they should allow the consultation process to reach

its logical conclusion. Meanwhile, the Government would like to reiterate the

appeal issued at the end of the all party meeting on January 6, 2011 that 'peace,

harmony, and law and order should be maintained in the State of Andhra Pradesh.'

Responding to the points raised by Shrimati Sushma Swaraj, Shri

Gurudas Dasgupta, Shri Sarvey Satyanarayana and Dr. K.S. Rao, the

Minister further stated:  There are a very large number of people in Andhra

Pradesh who are divided on this issue and nothing should be said and done in the

Parliament that will inflame passions there.  My effort from the very beginning has

been that the solution to the problem must come from the people of Andhra

Pradesh and the Government of India can only facilitate the solution.  The hon. Leader of the Opposition has referred the  Report of the States Reorganisation

Commission, the Gentlemen’s Agreement of 1956, the introduction of Article 371

(1) of the Constitution, the six-point formula of 1973, the introduction of 371 (d), and the elections to the State Assembly in May, 2009.  All this is a part of the long

history.  But there is also a more recent history.  As recently as December 7, 2009,

there was a Business Advisory Committee meeting followed by an All-Party

meeting in Hyderabad.  It  is based on the minutes of those meetings that the

Government of India, through me, made an announcement on December 9.  But

shortly after that statement was made on December 9, the situation at the ground

altered.  The principal  political party in Andhra Pradesh and the principal

Opposition party in Andhra Pradesh divided.  And when they divided, the

Government of India was obliged to take  notice of that fact and then we made a

statement on December, 23.   After that, the Srikrishna Committee was appointed

and the Committee is the authors of the Report.  The distinguished Judge, Justice

Srikirshna has adhered to the Terms of Reference.  The Terms of Reference did

require the Srikirshna Committee to explore the options that are available in order

to find a way forward and they have given six options.  But I cannot clarify why

the Justice Sri Krishna Committee added the Chapter VIII and said, “this Chapter

may be classified as secret.”  Whether it should be made public or not, it is a

matter, which is  sub judice in the Andhra Pradesh High Court.  A young boy

comes to Delhi.  It is reported that there is a death.  Police are investigating it.  It is

suspected to be a case of suicide.  There is a suspicion that the note reportedly or allegedly written by him was  in his pocket. The matter  is under investigation. 

Every death in such circumstances saddens us; it diminishes each one of us.  We

all should appeal to the youth of Andhra Pradesh not to take these extreme steps. 

The hon. Leader of the Opposition asked us to bring a Bill and they will support. 

That is her party’s political position.  The Government have to follow a particular

process in order to find the solution, and in that process, it will certainly take note

of the position the principle Opposition Party in the Lok Sabha today maintains

that Telangana should be created. There  are eight recognized political parties in

Andhra Pradesh.  Three parties, the BJP, TRS, and CPI are clearly for Telangana. 

One Party, the CPI(M), is opposed to  the creation of Telangana.  The TDP is

divided and four out of eight parties have not yet reached a final conclusion.  We

are urging the parties to kindly complete your process of consultation quickly so

that we can call an all party meeting and we can take a decision based upon what

they report to us at the meeting.  It may take a few weeks and it may take three

months.  But, we must be patient.  This involves the future of about 12 crore

people in Andhra Pradesh.  In the meanwhile,he appeal to the people of

Andhra Pradesh, especially the young men and women to maintain peace and

harmony until they come to a conclusion.

Telangana brethren!

1. Why are we hearing separate Telangana slogan again? 
The demand for a separate state of Telangana isn't new. Telanganites have very clearly expressed their opposition a decade before Andhra Pradesh was formed. They reasoned that in a united Andhra Pradesh they will not get justice. Even after five decades, this demand is continuing. The reason for this is the experience of past 48 years that justice will not be done to Telangana and belief that it will continue to be denied to Telanganites in united AP. 

2. Isn't Telangana slogan the creation of unemployed politicians? 
Telangana demand is a peoples' movement born out of their problems. Are all the people robbed unabatedly, continuously for the 48-years and raising their voice again , unemployed political leaders? Who are the unemployed political Leaders? Are they the farmers that have been suffering for lack of drinking water, irrigations water, and cuts in electric supply? Are they the workers who lost their livelihood due to lack of new industries, and closure of existing industries? Are they the unemployed youth whose job opportunities are hijacked by outsiders? Are they the innumerable people who have been labelled and suppressed as terrorists because they raised their voice for Telangana? When people are subject to robbery and injustice and take to the streets, it is natural for leaders to enter the fray. Just because out of power politicians support Telangana statehood, does it stop being peoples' movement? In any movement, politicians in and out of power join in. Some even deceive and attempt to side line the movement, but they can't stop the movement. Movements continue until justice is served to the people. The educated that are the pillars of this movement aren't unemployed. They aren't even after employment for themselves. 

3. Why didn't the Chief Ministers that came from Telangana area work to develop Telangana? 
It is true that PV Narasimha Rao, Marri Chenna Reddy (twice), T. Anjiah from Telangana were Chief Ministers of AP. Altogether they were in power for 6-years in four terms. It is also true they haven't made any noticeable development of Telangana. Jalagam Vengal Rao was a settler. He never assimilated himself in Telangana. He is credited with the disservice to Telangana by extending Nagarjun Sagar left canal. Then what about, Rayala Seema? There were stalwarts from Rayala seems that were in power for twenty years. (N. Sanjeeva Reddy-2terms, Damodaram Sanjeeviah, K. Vijaya Bhaskara Reddy-2 terms, CB Naidu-2 terms). Why is Rayalaseema backward? Fact is they slaved for the Coastal Andhra wealth and the privileged few of these wealthy that control the politics of the state. Fazal Ali commission recognized the consequences of mixing a developed area with a backward area and recommended that Telangana be kept as a separate state. If this country's politicians had the wherewithal to listen to the wise men, we wouldn't be in this situation! 

4. Isn't it detrimental to Indian national unity if small states are continuously created? 
Out of the 35 states currently in India (28 states and 7 central possessions), 70% are smaller than Telangana. Telangana's population is 30 million plus. There are 25 states that are smaller than Telangana. If these twenty-five don't cause national unity issues, why would creation of a larger state be any dangerous? 

5. What would you do if the backward districts in Telangana want a separate state of their own after formation of Telangana state? 
Backwardness of Telangana is a major reason for the Telangana state demand but not the sole reason. All ten Telangana districts have same historical background, geographic closeness, cultural commonality, language unity, and mutual understanding among the people. These factors are all foundation for unity of thought. Never did the people of Telangana districts express a desire or sentiment to be separate from the rest of the districts directly or indirectly. There isn't an opportunity for such either. In our country there are some other backward districts in various states. Are they all demanding a separate statehood? It is meaningless and baseless argument. 

6. Why do people with one language need two states? 
If one language, one state is the norm, why do we have 9-Hindhi speaking states? Next to Hindi, Telugu is the most spoken language in India. What is wrong with having two states that speak Telugu? Some people claim that Telangana Telugu isn't the proper Telugu. Some others say it isn't even Telugu. Why should these people that make fun of Telangana language and ridicule its culture should be objecting if Telangana is separate state? 

7. Isn't a separate state, a nation dividing, people separating and demand? 
If the desire of a people of a region to have their own state is a divisive act, then all states formation is a divisive act. In fact language based state formation itself is a divisive act. Same reasons that Potti Sriramulu the architect for separation of Andhra from Madras state, presented are the reasons Telanganites want their own state. The same argument used by the Andhras in the past is used by Telanganites now. If it was not an objectionable demand then how could it be objectionable now? 

8. How long should states division continue? 
States re-organization is a continuing activity in India. Even before Fazal Ali commission this process has started, Example: Formation of Andhra, split from Madras. It has been continuing ever since, Ex: Eastern states division, Maharastra, Gujrath, Punjab, Haryana, Himachal Pradesh, Jarkhand, Uttaranchal, Chattisghad. Why should there be any objections for Telangana formation when there were no such objections for these states formation? 

9. There are other backward areas in the state. Why should only Telangana people have a separate state of their own? 
Just as Telangana, Rayalaseema and north Andhra have been discriminated. True. But, additionally Telangana has been systemically robbed. Diversion of this regions natural resources, water, underground resources and their income to other areas, the robbing of jobs from the region's people, Colonization aren't directed at other areas. Additionally the Telanganites have been subject to ridicule with respect to the language and the politicians have been looked down upon to the extent they lost their own self image. To preserve their self respect and to protect their region's natural resources, people of Telangana want their own state. 

10. Aren't Naxalites the cause of Telangana's backwardness? 
Only people that don't understand or like to conveniently ignore historical facts would ask such questions. Naxals aren't the cause of Telangana backwardness. They are an effect of Telangana backwardness. Naxals came up in Telangana due to this region has been subject to continues neglect and systematic theft of its resources. 

11. Instead of asking for a separate state, why can't you fight for development within the frame work of united AP? 
The promises of Telangana development have been made for the past 48 years in united AP. Before and after the formation of AP, Which promises were kept? Which agreements were respected? Which projects were implemented? Which principles were they bound to? From the first day of AP formation, till to-day, agreements are being broken. What were the united AP wishers do? Did they even express any concerns? How long should the Telangana people bear this and put up with this injustice? 

12. Isn't separate Telangana state an anti-Andhra people's movement? 
Emphatically, no. Telangana people don't bear any animosity against the coastal Andhra or Rayalaseema people or the ordinary migrants from those areas to Telangana. Telangana people's anger is with: The rulers that are raping Telangana resources. With their supporters in Andhra and also from Telangana. Those that came to Telangana and think they are the rulers of Telangana. Those that control the state Government with their financial strength and rob Telangana. Those that ridicule, Telangana language, culture and their mannerisms. All those that become a part of Telangana and share in the happiness and sorrow of Telangana with the locals are welcomed and, respected and loved. 

13. What is there to be gained by the SC, ST and weaker sections in separate Telangana? 
What did these groups gain in united AP in 48 years? Apart from Sanjeeviah being CM for few months, when did any of these classes have any power? What is the status of these peoples leadership? What is the attitude of current Congress, BJP, both the communist parties, TDP? Not only the weaker sections, even the forward classes of Telangana, do they have any opportunity to exert any real power? For these classes to gain power they have to become active. For the past few years these people are rising, becoming active. No matter how active they become, in the united AP, not only these but other classes of people will also not progress. At least the forward class in Telangana have come to realization that it is unavoidable in the society for all people to a rightful share in the political power. Because of this there is opportunity in Separate Telangana for true democracy represented by all people, to prevail. 

14. Andhras have built Hyderabad. Is it fair to ask them to leave it now? 
Hyderabad was a beautiful city built by Nizam on the sweat of Telangana villagers. One of the reasons Andhras eyed Telangana was Hyderabad- a readymade beautiful Capitol city. It was fifth largest city before AP was formed and it still is fifth largest city. If Andhras contributed to Hyderabad, it was not out of love for Telangana but was for the convenience of the rich Andhras that have made Hyderabad their home. Hyderabad is still growing but not from Andhras coming to settle but from the middle classes and forward classes of Telangana moving to the city for security and for services and livelihood, as the village economy in Telangana is all but destroyed by neglect of the ruling class, and failure of monsoons. Besides, nobody is asking anybody to leave any place. India is a free country and anybody can go and stay and pursue their livelihood anywhere in India. Hyderabad is a cosmopolitan city and people from many languages and all states of India call it their home. Also, this isn't a separation of people like Pakistan and India. It is merely a separation of political and administrative machinery so people of Telangana can control their own destiny. The settlers are welcome to stay, contribute and share in the success of Telangana. 

Why Telangana

1. There are 10 districts in Telangana, 9 in Andhra and 4 in Rayalaseema. Out of these Districts, 7 are in Telangana, 3 are in Andhra and 1 in Rayalaseema are considered as severely backward districts which means 70% of districts in Telangana a re backward while in Andhra it is 35% and in Rayalaseema it is 25%. Apart from these there are some areas in all parts of the state which are also backward. 

2. 45% of the state income comes from Telangana region. When it comes to utilization of funds, the share of Telangana is only 28%. 

3. Normally canals are dug to supply water to the crops from rivers for cultivation. The amount of land cultivated through canals in just Guntur district is MORE THAN the land cultivated with canals in entire Telangana region. 

4. Nagarjuna sagar dam is built in Nalgonda district which is in Telangana but majority of the water from the dam is used for Krishna and Guntur district. The original dam was supposed to be build much ahead of its present location but the location was changed so that it falls in the Telangana region. Due to the construction of the dam several hectares of Lime stone mines vanished as part of the dam back waters. Everyone knows that lime stone is used for producing cement. Even the natural resources were not allowed to remain. 

5. Fluorinated water problem is only in Nalgonda district which has not been resolved since decades. 

6. Two major rivers Krishna and Tungabhadra enter the state of AP in the district of Mahaboobnagar (the biggest district in Telangana) but the district always remains the worst draught hit areas along with Anantapur because there is no project and process with which the water can be utilized. The plan for utilization has been pending for decades. 

7. RDS (Rajolibanda Diversion Scheme) is building in Mahaboobnagar to provide water to 85000 hectares of land in the district. The leaders of Rayalaseema blasted the gates of RDS and water is supplied to KC (Kurnool-Cudapa) canal while only remaining water, if any, is supplied to the lands in Mahaboobnagar. 

8. 3 TMC of water from Gandipet is sufficient to supply drinking water to our city. Every year 1700 TMC of water is wasted and is flown into Bay of Bengal from river Godavari. Starting from Nizamabad to Bay of Bengal there is no project allowed to build on Godavari. If it is built leaders in Godavari districts fear that the fertile lands in the area may fall short of water. If the Godavari water is utilized properly, there will be no scarcity for food grains in our state. 

9. In Telangana regions, only few areas cultivate one crop a year and very rarely two crops a year while most of the land doesn't even cultivate single crop. In both the Godavari districts, Krishna and Guntur district, two crops a year is common and there are times where even 3 crops a year are cultivated. The only reason is WATER. 

10. Government issue G.O.'s for implicating its decisions. G.O number 610 is the longest non implicated G.O in the history of AP. The G.O was issued in 1986 by late NTR who was then the CM of AP, which is not yet implicated. The G.O speaks about the share of Telangana employees in Government jobs in Telangana region. 

11. 33% of the population in Mahaboobnagar district have left the district for livelihood to different parts of the state due to draught and majority of them are working as daily labour. No other district has so many people who fled the home place due to lack of livelihood and working as daily labour. 

12. There are 25 plus government degree colleges in Krishna, Cudapa and Guntur district while there is not even a single government degree college in Rangareddy district. 

13. Dairy development corporation of AP purchases milk from farmers across the state for distribution. For the same milk, in Andhra, the government pays Rs.24 to the farmers and in Telangana they pay Rs.22 per liter. Partiality is shown even in milk. 

14. In between 2005-2008 government sold lands worth Rs.20000 crores in and around Hyderabad which was utilized to build projects in Rayalaseema and Andhra. 

15. Not even a single project was completed in Telangana in the last 5 years while several projects were completed in Andhra and Rayalaseema. Not just Telangana but areas of Northern Andhra, Prakasham and parts of Rayalaseema are still backward. The state needs to progress as a unit. People are suffering across the state and they need a solution. 

Telangana   Telangana for Growth Telangana for britherhood  Telangana for Unity

                 Vishwajeet Singh